Congratulations Ashland Authors

Congratulations to Ashland writers publishing books in 2013

    Midge Raymond Everyday Book Marketing

    Jennifer Margulis The Business of Baby: What Doctors Don’t Tell You, What Corporations Try to Sell You, and How to Put Your Pregnancy, Childbirth, and Baby Before Their Bottom Line

    Molly Best Tinsley Broken Angels

    Virginia Morell Animal Wise: The Thoughts and Emotions of Our Fellow Creatures

    David Churchman Why We Fight

    Diana Maltz (Editor) A Child of the Jago

    Barbara Trincaro Ashland, Oregon

    Ed Battistella A Year of New Words

Posted in Ideas and Opinions, Literary Events in Southern Oregon | Comments Off on Congratulations Ashland Authors

In Praise of Copyeditors

I’m finishing up responding to a copyeditor’s suggestions and queries for a book on the language of public apologies. In an earlier post, I mentioned errors Jennifer Marcellus found in the early drafts of the manuscript. This post is about some of the work of the house copyeditors for Oxford University Press. As usual, the copyeditor made all sorts of interesting improvements to the copy. Here’s a sample of the edits.

Some were stylistic, to conform to the Chicago style:

    Before his death at the age of 60sixty, Goffman wrote eleven books studying social interactions. His work demonstrated that Eeveryday interactions, he showed, should not be taken at face value.
    He added that “Today, all we can do is apologize. But [only the survivors] . . . have the power to forgive.”

Here the editor changes the number to a numeral (you spell out up to a hundred). The editor also rearranged the second sentence to remove the interpolated “he showed” and make “his work” to the topic. In the second example the “that” is struck for conciseness. Other style changed included changing some upper case to lower and omitting the “of” in dates.

    The Ppresident added that, while he had been “disturbed” by the lobbying for representation on the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he was “certain that the Marine Corps itself does not indulge in such propaganda.”

    In 1947, HUAC held hearings on Ccommunists in Hollywood and Ccommunist themes in movies

    McCain’s plane, a Douglas A-4 Skyhawk, was shot down by a surface-to-air missile over Hanoi in October of 1967.

Despite my best efforts to cut unnecessary words, there were still plenty of places where the copyeditor made improvements:

    Goffman, he says, approaches apology too much from the point of view viewpoint of the offender, and treats treating it as a mere linguistic device for changing the meaning of an offense.

    Later it also added wWives, widows, and children were later added to the medical coverage.

    She reiterates the pride she took in citation her pride in proper citation and its importance to historians and by describing describes technological changes she made to her practice—computers, scanners, and “the mysterious footnote key on the computer” shown to her by her son.

    She goes on to concede concedes

In several places too, the copyeditor picked a more precise phrasing or readable syntax.

    Here In this statement Packwood asserted his convictions and framed his conduct as failing to live up to his own standards. He promised to change and asked for a chance to earn back constituents’ trust back.

    Truman went on to explain the circumstances context of his comments and to express his appreciation for their the Marines’ work.

    In While in prison, Tucker found religion.

    Packwood’s press conference and his two earlier previous apology attempts at apology illustrate the main themes of his defense over the next three years.

    And, according to Benoit, it can also mean blame shifting blame by offering another culprit.

Finally, there were some author queries, like this one:

    Wallace had denounced him as an “integratin’, carpetbaggin’, scalliwaggin’ liar” and once suggested he be given a “barbed wire-enema.” [AU: Please confirm placement of hyphens in this direct quote.]

I had misplaced the hyphen, which should go between “barbed” and “wire” of course. When I Googled the original quote, I began to get some frightening internet ads in the margin of the search engine.

Three cheers for copyeditors.

Posted in Ideas and Opinions, Language | Comments Off on In Praise of Copyeditors

An Interview with Heather Arndt Anderson

Portland-based Heather Arndt Anderson is the author of Breakfast: A History (Baltimore: Rowman & Littlefield Studies in Food and Gastronomy, 2013) and wrote the Pacific Northwest chapter in the 4-volume Food Cultures of the World Encyclopedia (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2011). Her recipes have been published in the cookbook One Big Table: 600 Recipes from the Nation’s Best Home Cooks, Farmers, Fishermen, Pit-Masters, and Chefs, and she is a contributing writer to the magazines The Farmer General and Remedy Quarterly.

You can follow her blog at Voodooandsauce.com.

EB: Your book is part of the “meals series” by Alta Mira Press. What’s the meals series?

HA: It is exactly what it sounds like: a series of single-topic books about the meals. The series includes the Big Three (Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner), but will also feature Picnic, Brunch and Barbecue. Obviously, Breakfast is the most important meal so it came first.

EB: In you book you mention that breakfast was stigmatized for quite some time. Why was that?

HA: Breakfast had been attached to a form of gluttony identified by the 13th-century Dominican priest Thomas Aquinas. He attributed the meal to praepropere, or “eating too soon.” It was assumed that if one needed to eat breakfast, one likely had other lusty appetites as well. In the medieval era, it was understood that the only people who needed to eat breakfast were children, the elderly and infirm, or worse: the laboring poor.

EB: What was the importance of the industrial revolution in changing the way we ate—and understood—breakfast?

HA: For the first time, breakfast foods could be eaten far from their point of origin. Goods could be shipped by train after the Transcontinental Railroad was built, making foods that had previously been only enjoyed by the wealthiest members of society available to everyone. The rising middle class had disposable money for things like coffee and tea, and technological advances in the kitchen meant that average housewives could accomplish foods like toast and waffles without kitchen staff.

EB: Breakfast seems to be done differently by different cultures and different subcultures. What are some of the extremes?

HA: I think the kaiseki breakfasts of Japan riokan (rural inns) are some of the most intricate meals one could ever experience. Imagine an endless parade of tiny, immaculate dishes that perfectly exemplify the region and season. Because they work so hard, the Amish of Pennsylvania enjoy a similarly staggering array of foods, but the volume is much greater: fried eggs and potatoes, biscuits with sausage gravy, apple pie, oatmeal, pancakes, homemade sausage and bacon, liverwurst (among other pork by-products), all washed down with coffee.

EB: Breakfast has always seemed to me to be associated with conversation—even more so that dinner. Did you find that also?

HA: I find the opposite true, actually. Nothing has yet happened in the day to talk about. And I usually eat my breakfast alone, after my husband and son are gone for the day.

EB: Were fast food breakfasts a relatively recent invention?

HA: Not really; breakfast sandwiches were popular in the mid-1800s in England. Workers in London would grab a ’bacon- or sausage-filled bread roll called a ‘bap’ on the way to work, and stalls even sold coffee. You’d stand there, drink you coffee, and then hand the mug back to the stall owner.

EB: You have a chapter on the art and culture. How is breakfast part of popular culture?

HA: Breakfast is used metaphorically in a number of ways, but most of these pertain to normalcy. Breakfast is the normalcy from which a character can deviate, or it can be used to set the stage for an episode’s conflict (which is conveniently resolved at the dinner table). Because it’s the first meal of the day it can easily be used to convey a sense of new beginnings. The choices a character makes at breakfast are used to define that character’s very being: a man’s red-blooded simplicity is exemplified by his selection of bacon and eggs with black coffee, as is a woman’s daintiness by her toast and grapefruit half. Breakfast has also been used to signify sexual encounters; in the early days of film and television, when censorship was stronger, a breakfast scene could be a coy intimation that a couple had been intimate the night before.

EB: What’s the history of brunch? Or is that a separate book?

HA: That’s a separate book! Although the history isn’t as long, it features more booze, so there’s that.

EB: Thanks for talking with us.

Posted in Interviews | Comments Off on An Interview with Heather Arndt Anderson

An Interview with Peter Laufer

Peter Laufer is a journalist, broadcaster and documentary filmmaker and he holds the James Wallace Chair in Journalism at the University of Oregon. He is the author of 20 books on such topics as the media, immigration, natural history, and crime. He has a Master’s Degree from the American University in Washington, DC, and a Ph.D. in Cultural Studies from Leeds Metropolitan in England.

Laufer was a correspondent for NBC News and the charter anchor of the radio program “National Geographic World Talk,” a nationally-syndicated show he created.

We sat down to talk about his most recent book: The Elusive State of Jefferson: A Journey through the 51st State, available from Globe Pequot Press.

EB: What got you interested in the State of Jefferson?

PL: Borders, identity and migration fascinate me. After I finished a book that focused on California’s southern border, it occurred to me that I should look at the less spotlighted northern border. Once I started the preliminary research I realized that the so-called State of Jefferson movement not only is intrinsically intriguing, it serves as a metaphor for the ghastly schisms we Americans are suffering nationwide. The Elusive State of Jefferson offers a grand adventure combined with a cautionary tale.

EB: You’ve told the story as a narrative of your research. Any particular reason you chose that style?

PL: I fancy myself a storyteller. I want the reader to come along with me as I travel the Jefferson backroads. I want the reader to meet the strange-but-true characters I meet during my journey. And I want the reader to consider the broader lessons of Jefferson for all of us. For these goals a narrative approach seems most alluring.

EB: Mayor Gilbert Gable died on Dec. 5, 1941—right after the initial vote to secede and right before the attack at Pearl Harbor. Would things have turned out differently if he’d lived?

PL: Not for the Jefferson movement. Even without the Pearl Harbor attack, the publicity stunt that was 1941’s Jefferson (just as today’s resurgence is a publicity stunt) had already run its course. I wager PR expert Gable would have been the first to recognize that the gambit served its purpose. The next act for him and Jefferson would have been to parlay the notoriety into productive engagement with Salem and Sacramento.

EB: How much of the 1941 secession—the roadblocks, the Proclamation of Independence, etc.–were just publicity stunts?

PL: 100 percent.

EB: What was the appeal of the story nationally? The San Francisco Chronicle coverage won a Pulitzer! And you mention that the secession vote made the front page of the New York Times in 1941.

PL: The appeal of the story nationally was diversion and entertainment – both admirable goals. As is the case today, the nation was weary of war talk. We Americans love underdogs and seemingly independent Wild West characters. The Jefferson fairytale, then and now, suggested a quick fix for frustrations. Trouble for those who took it too seriously – then and now – is that both politically and financially there is no realistic case for Jefferson, as I explain in detail in the book. There never will be a State of Jefferson.

EB: Was there a specific issue that got people so riled up in 1941?

PL: Bad roads and irritation with feeling ignored by the rest of Oregon and California.

EB: Much of the book describes present day secessionists. In early September, in fact, the Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors voted 4-1 to secede. Are the issues different now that they were in 1941?

PL: Modoc County followed a few weeks later. They both need to look at their budgets. More tax dollars come up from Sacramento to provide these rural counties with needed social services than they send south. What are the issues? The rebels today feel their individual rights are being trampled by urbanites. They should read their Constitutions.

EB: What do you see as the future of these counties in southern Oregon and northern California?

PL: Tourism. Information industries. Timber and mining are yesterday’s news. As I suggest in the book, if the Jefferson proponents really think they can go it alone they should change the name of their nascent state to Garbo. The actress was famous for wanting to be left alone. Jefferson, on the other hand, saw the advantages of working together. (That is if they mean Thomas. If they mean Jefferson Davis, that’s another story.)

EB: You delve into the culture of the State of Jefferson. What sort of a cultural identity has evolved? Are there differences between the California parts of Jefferson and the Oregon parts?

PL: An unfortunately fractured cultural identity has evolved with competing interests at odds over water, land use, timber, fishing, tribal rights and the rule of law. Perhaps that’s why the escapism of the statehood movement charade is so appealing.

EB: Thanks for talking with us.

Posted in Interviews, What People Are Reading | Comments Off on An Interview with Peter Laufer