E-Books: E-Cafes?

As E-books are becoming the future of literature, and Amazon continues to drive Barnes and Noble out of business, I wonder what product will come out to fill the need that book retailers provide.

I try not to embrace the sentimental side of keeping technology old, though I have a tendency to do so.  When Windows Vista was released I complained about it until a programming friend of mine said, “I don’t want my computer interface to stay the same for twenty years.”  The comment stuck with me and now I try to embrace rather than fear change.

So I will get a Kindle, or an Ipad, or whichever technology wins this race.

But the bookstores that are going out of business did provide another service that the E-books aren’t compatible with:  shopping.  The process of going to a bookstore, browsing for titles -often picking books that make us look smarter to leave a better impression-, and buying a coffee afterward, is not fulfilled by online shopping.

I believe this is a basic need of our society, and more coffee shops might spring up throughout the town.  If E-books are the wave of the future, maybe Starbucks with digital book kiosks will accompany the new technology.

If anything, putting more commerce online may reverse the seventies trend of community centers shifting from downtown to the mall.

 

 

Posted in Ideas and Opinions | Comments Off on E-Books: E-Cafes?

Research Report

I have decided to conduct my research project on the history of bookbinding in America.  I am still gathering sources, but my interest in this topic so far has been on the impact of mass-produced books on methods of bookbinding.  I will also examine the art of bookbinding by hand in contemporary America through an analysis of courses offered at the American Academy of Bookbinding. 

I am starting my research with a book entitled Bookbinding in America.  It’s a little dated, but it is a nice starting point.  I am currently looking at conditions leading to the introduction of machines to bookbinding.  I am also looking at the introduction of cloth bindings, the beginnings of casing, the invention of machines operated by hand, then by horse, then by steam and now by electricity. 

The meat of my paper, however, will be the role mass-produced paperback books played in changing bookbinding in America.  I will also look at how hardcover books are bound in contemporary America, how hardcover bindings differ from paperback bindings, and why hardcover books, which are presumably more expensive to bind, are still produced (I will look at the motivation driving this production).

So far, the subject of my paper seem a little random, so my primary task over the next week or so will be to find some kind of continuity between these subjects.

Posted in Ideas and Opinions | Comments Off on Research Report

Five Elements of Writing

Jennifer Margulis’ ideas on the five most important elements of a written work has stuck with me for several days (ah heck, I guess it’s weeks at this point). Last term in Composition, Dr. Battistella discussed the importance of having a clear character (not just in the fictional sense) and ensuring that the character appears first in each thought, sentence or idea. Well Jennifer’s thoughts on those five elements just expanded this idea for me.

I won’t lie; it was hard for me to imagine my topic as a character. I think of characters as fictional beings, a product of my imagination. But I realize in a research paper the character is my topic. So when Jennifer suggested that the character should: 1) be strong, 2) be at the center of some tension and 3) grow, I gained a little more perspective how to utilize my character to full effect.

Why shouldn’t I think of my topic as a character? A topic isn’t flat and stagnate, unless I let it be, so why shouldn’t there be tension and growth? Now I just have to figure out how to apply this in my writing…wish me luck!

Posted in Ideas and Opinions | Comments Off on Five Elements of Writing

HD Reader–Redundant?

Blackstone Audio’s presentation on audio books wasn’t of much personal interest to me, particularly since I’m hearing-impaired and only retain 60% or so of what I hear without captions or the ability to read a speaker’s lips.  I was initially intrigued by the idea of Blackstone Audio’s HD Reader (although I would never use it myself, because I’m a fast reader and would be bored by the reader’s slower talking speed), but it quickly lost its charm.  It brings to mind all the times in middle school we were forced to take turns reading out loud from textbooks as a class.  Those were some of the most excruciating hours of my life!  I don’t see the benefit of this sort of reader, other than for educational purposes, and as Samantha pointed out in an earlier blog post, that sort of technology would not be available to everyone–and especially not the people or schools that might need it most.

I remember my little sister having a toy called a Leap Pad, I think.  It was an interactive toy that would “read” books out loud when you clicked on parts of it.  Isn’t the HD Reader just imitating a learning device that already exists, albeit for an older audience?  The Leap Pad is limited to the books they provide for their product, but so too the HD Reader is limited to the books that have been recorded, although admittedly there are a lot more of them.

I apologize if my thoughts seem disorganized or obvious, but I was unimpressed by Blackstone’s reader, and I’m writing this to figure out why.  Where will the technology go?  Who will actually use it?  It seems a tad redundant to listen to the same thing you’re already reading.  The information is all there, why add extra?  For a super-duper all-inclusive learning bonanza?  I imagine the device would be useful for children struggling with reading, but here we are, back to whether those children will ever actually see this technology.  I find it difficult to believe people will use the reader, say, on the bus, when they could be simply reading instead.  There’s a purpose for an audio book–getting to “read” in a situation where you can’t actually read, but the audio/reader hybrid doesn’t exactly fill a need.  Let’s be honest.  How many of my fellow college students would actually sit down and slowly read your textbook with this thing?  Maybe I’m wrong, but I’m guessing not a whole lot.  On the other hand, it would be awesome to listen to your textbook while you’re driving to school, as a classmate pointed out during the presentation.  Audio books fill a need.  Book books fill a need.  Where does the HD reader fill in the gaps?

Eschewing the negativity, Blackstone Audio gave a great presentation, and I appreciate their innovation.  I hope their reader goes somewhere, and maybe someday even I will find a use for it.

Posted in Ideas and Opinions | Comments Off on HD Reader–Redundant?