The Future of Books and Reading

The presentation of the HD Reader, along with the growing significance of audiobooks–which have been around for much longer–leads us to a natural question: what is reading? Does it include these new technological steps where we listen and imagine instead of literally looking at the words on a page? Or is this something else entirely?

It’s kind of a cheap answer, but I think it all depends on how you define “reading.” Consider that one of the things many teachers and scholars say is that reading is good for your brain because it exercises your imagination. In that sense, it is the act of imagining that functions as the “reading,” and audiobooks have the same effect. We hear things instead of reading them, sure, but we still see them in our heads, so the mental part is definitely present. On the other hand, when we describe children listening to stories read by parents, we don’t think of them as “readers.” We think of them as “being read to.” We say that reading to our children is healthy because it helps children learn how to read, not because it’s actually reading.

But something interesting to note about this phenomenon that I’ve heard comparatively little about is how it’s possible to read words without actually reading. See, I’m someone easily distracted by his own wandering thoughts. Therefore, even as a grade school student, I could be sitting there staring at the pages, going through the words, but not get anything from them. This frequently led me to have to reread pages over and over again, and by the end of a month, I’d be lucky if I’d finished 100 pages of a story. Now I could have continued “reading” in spite of having gained nothing from the words and I can assure everyone that I’d have finished tons of books by now, but that isn’t really what we think of as “reading,” is it? To read, one must also be paying attention and follow the story. When we think of it this way, it could be argued–assuming it is easier to pay attention to a speaking voice than to words on a page–that some people “read” better with audiobooks than with written text.

So that leaves us with the big question that we started with: what is reading? If you were to put a gun to my head and demand I tell you exactly what I thought constituted “reading” and what didn’t, I’d probably call either the cops or a psychologist as you would clearly need some medical attention. But assuming that option was off the table, I’d say that I think the answer is smack dab in the middle of it all. To read the actual text constitutes “technical reading” regardless of whether you pay attention, and to pay attention as you read constitutes both “technical” and “mental” reading. Audiobooks constitute “mental reading,” but not “technical reading.”

The HD Reader is some combination of all of those that will allow more people to get involved in the market, whether that’s through the more technical avenues of reading or the more mental aspects of reading.
Regardless of what we call reading or not, what I believe is that we’ll move farther away from the “technical” aspects of reading over the next few years and farther into the “mental” realm of reading. Why? Because it’s easier to listen while we do our chores than it is to sit still and stare at a page. The latter can even be sleep-inducing, while the former keeps us wide awake. Call it better or worse, but that is the future I see for reading.

Posted in Ideas and Opinions | Comments Off on The Future of Books and Reading

An Interview with Dr. Diana Maltz

Dr. Diana Maltz is a specialist in late-Victorian literature and culture.  She has been a professor at SOU since 1999 and is current Chair of the Language, Literature, and Philosophy Department. She received her BA in Literature and History from Bennington College, and both her MA and PhD in English from Stanford University. In addition to her book, British Aestheticism and the Urban Working Classes: Beauty for the People, 1870-1914 (2006), Dr. Maltz has published in a variety of professional journals and essay collections (9 articles and 11 essays). Her articles on Victorian counterculture have appeared in Victorian Literature and Culture and Journal of Victorian Culture.

We began our conversation by discussing the differences between academic publishing and other genres of publishing. The academic world has its own sub-cultures of writings and a specific publisher usually becomes well known for certain fields of work. For example, Dr. Maltz specializes in Victorian Studies and is therefore is very familiar with publishers such as Ashgate Publishing and Ohio State University Press. In academic publishing it’s very important to match your interest with publishers.  I thought that this was a really interesting point because it helps give young academic writers some direction as to what company might be best suited to publish their material.

After giving me an introduction to the world of academic publishing, Dr. Maltz went on to describe both the drawbacks and rewards of this particular type of writing. Obviously academic writing does not reach as large of an audience as books like Harry Potter do, and therefore may never see similar profits. However, Dr. Maltz assured me that most authors of critical writings are professors who write because it helps advance their field of study, not because they expect to make millions off of their articles or essays. Another challenge that she mentioned was the struggle of maintaining a balance between teaching and working on new publications. As students, I’m sure we can all relate to the challenge of time management but the added stress of trying to publish material, not just write it, seems daunting.

We then moved on to discussing the rewards involved with being published. As all English majors have experienced, there is a certain satisfaction that comes with seeing your work in print, but more importantly Dr. Maltz noted, is the feeling of being a part of community who shares your interest and love of academics. She mentioned how rewarding it was to know that your work will go on to possibly help future graduate students in their own academic efforts.

My next question for Dr. Maltz was what advice she had for young writers who decide to go into academic publishing. She really stressed that writers need to be aware that this field of writing is part of a package of a particular kind of lifestyle and is heavily connected with the work of being a professor. And of course, network! Talk to people who have been published in academic journals and learn how they navigated it. From what I’ve experienced, SOU’s English Department faculty would be a great place to start.

Dr. Maltz was first published in a collection of essays in 1999. Over a decade later, she has had the chance to observe some of the changes academic publishing has undergone. She notes there has been a shift towards more career-oriented mentorship in PhD programs. Dr. Maltz commented that she sees a lot more coaching taking place between professors and graduate students with the hope that if a student has been published while in graduate school, they have a greater chance of obtaining a job after graduation.

My interview with Dr. Maltz gave me a great insight into the world of academic publishing. Currently, she has a contract with Broadview Press to edit a new critical edition of Arthur Morrison’s novel “A Child of the Jago.” She is adding a brand new introduction and incorporating footnotes of the text with the hope that it will enrich her students reading of the novel when she teaches it.

Interviewer’s note: I don’t have a recording device and my phone’s digital quality is awful, therefore I reconstructed my interview with Diana Maltz from notes taken during our discussion and added some of my own personal reflections on what I learned. 

Posted in Ideas and Opinions, Interviews | Comments Off on An Interview with Dr. Diana Maltz

Kudos to our Spring Guest Speakers

The spring term has just about come to an end and I want to take a minute to thank our terrific History of Publishing guest lecturers this term. Each of them helped us to home in on what is going on in the publishing and book industry today. We’ll check in with some of them at the Ashland Book and Author Festival next week.

    Geoff Ridden, author and audiobook narrator for Bee Audio

    Tim Wohlforth, mystery author of Harry, The Pink Tarantula, and No Time to Mourn (just released by Krill Press

    Mary Jane Cedar Face, special collection librarian at Souhtenr Oregon Universtiy.

    Midge Raymond & John Yunker, award-winning authors and founders of Ashland Creek Press (and I’m looking forward to reading Midge’s book Everyday Writing)

    Rick Bleiweiss & Craig Black of Blackstone Audio

    Ryan W. Bradley, author (Code for Failure), publisher (Artistically Declined Press) & book designer

    Sheila Burns, cofounder of Ashland’s Bloomsbury Books

    Steve Scholl, founder of White Cloud Press

    Molly Tinsley, author (of the recently released Entering the Blue Stone, among other things) and publisher, FUZE Publishing

    Kristen Johnson, SOU Bookstore Textbook Manager

    Robin Conrad and Susan Dethridge, Ingram Content Group

    Melissa Michaels, Michaels & Michaels Creative, LLC

    Michael Niemann, author of “Africa Always Needs Guns” in Vengeance, the 2012 Mystery Writers of America anthology

    Samantha Niemeyer, copywriter at Fire Mountain Gems

    Kevin Walsh, rare book dealer

Thanks.

Posted in Ideas and Opinions | Comments Off on Kudos to our Spring Guest Speakers

Instant communication hurting artistic tendancies?

As I sit here with my V8 considering what to write about for my very first blog post (I know, the lashes should be coming any minute now for being this late), I consider what I’ve done with the last forth of my life. That’s right, ¼ of my existence is already gone, and for what? Education. As Americans, we spend a approximately a quarter of our lives on preparing for our lives. An acquaintance of mine recently noted that the system is flawed, ridiculous, and should be only a few years of our life. I didn’t say much to oppose him, but I did mention something noble about how “life isn’t the destination, it’s the journey” and other things that make people roll their eyes when you post it on Facebook.

Okay, let’s get serious for a moment. This article focuses on the opportunity to publish a book or write for a magazine, which only a fraction of people actually ever attain. But how many people actually try? My playlist at the moment consists of several songs that firmly state how many people spend their life daydreaming, instead of going out and actually doing what they might love to do.

So why not write a book? Why not sit down and actually try putting words to paper, instead of dreaming up what you could have done now and later on when you don’t have the opportunity – or even worse, when it’s too late? My theory is that individuals are afraid. Not just afraid in the sense that they can’t accomplish it, but afraid to put themselves out on the line. For many, writing a book for the first time is like laying your soul bare. Submitting your work to public scrutiny is not just putting your heart on your sleeve; publishing for the public is pulling the shirt off, wrapping it up around your heart, and tossing it to the bath salt zombies. Critics can be harsh, especially with the anonymity of the internet.

I’d like to study more how our culture has sunken in on itself. Sunken in roughly defined as the individuals becoming their own private islands, instead of large intertwined communities. We may pretend that technology has brought us closer together, and in a way it has. But the actual, intimate connections have been lost, and in that the ability to truly appreciate the feedback we can get on our works of writing and anything we do. Instead of well thought out critiques on pieces that take a longer time to get to the author and create, anyone from anywhere can write anything about your work, which can be instantly received via the world wide web. We’ve all experienced the rude or short comments on the internet such as “flaming” that are discouraging no matter how many times you tell yourself it’s not important. Even at a ratio of 100 positive feedback to one negative, that one negative comment can send you careening down into a pit of anti-literature despair. Well, most people. After a certain amount of pushing yourself to lay your work bare, a person learns to work around those comments, and work with the ones that offer helpful advice. I believe the encouragement for people to write is faltering because of this fact, the knowledge that as soon as we publish a piece online or even in person, it’s immediately accessible.  Instant gratification and instant criticism can both be achieved.

This is a hard trek to achieve, but hey, YOLO. A motto I don’t endorse at all, but has its good merits. The intent was right, the execution… not so much.

So, how do we solve this?

This is a post to simply encourage people to stop daydreaming about the things they “could” do, and give it a try. It’s like when you put two things behind your back and force yourself to pick one.  Once you have to make a decision, you figure out what you really want. This is the same concept, applied to a grander scale. If you at least try to write a book and “get it out there,” you’ll realize either that it’s something you truly do want to accomplish, or if it was just a passing fancy and there’s something other you want to spend your time doing.

 

Related Song:

Posted in Ideas and Opinions | Comments Off on Instant communication hurting artistic tendancies?