An Interview with Michael Niemann

Michael Niemann grew up in western Germany and studied at the Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms Universität in Bonn, Germany, and at the Graduate School of International Studies at the University of Denver where he received a PhD in International Studies. A specialist in global and African issues, he is the author of A Spatial Approach to Regionalism in the Global Economy and for many years he taught at Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut. Today he divides his time among writing, teaching, and app development. His short story “Africa Always Needs Guns” will appear in the 2012 Mystery Writers of America Anthology Vengeance edited by Lee Child.

EB: Can you tell us a little about your forthcoming story “Africa Always Needs Guns?” (What’s the story about? How did you place it in the MWA anthology?

MN: The story’s protagonist is Valentin Vermeulen, an investigator for the United Nations Office of Internal Oversight Services, the internal watchdog department of the UN. He had a pretty nice gig in NYC, but he annoyed some superiors during an investigation and now he’s sent to investigate fraud at UN missions around the world. His job in the story is to determine if weapons are smuggled into Bunia, eastern DR Congo, and how they get there. He’s about to nail the person responsible, but finds that that the bureaucracy and fuzzy lines of authority make it impossible to arrest that person. You’ll have to read it to find out what happens.

When I finished the story, I didn’t know what to do with it. There aren’t many outlets for short stories anymore and even fewer for crime stories. Tim Wohlforth in my writing group thought that the story was perfect for the upcoming MWA competition. The MWA usually commissions ten stories and holds an open competition for ten more for each anthology. I hadn’t even known about it. So, I joined MWA and submitted it.

EB: What was the editorial process like? Did the editors have good suggestions?

MN: The process was easy. The first go-around was mostly fixing the errors that crept in when the file was scanned. I had to submit a paper copy and they scanned it. That always introduces some errors in addition to my own mistakes. About two months later, I got another copyedited version and this one really made some rough spots flow better. I really appreciated those suggestions and adopted almost all. Finally, I got the page proofs in early January. A few new mistakes had crept in, again with the improper transcription of the French and Spanish terms. Overall, it was a good experience.

EB: When did you decide to turn to writing fiction? And why crime fiction?

MN: I think many academics secretly want to write fiction. We write scholarly articles and books and, most of the time, our total readership barely breaks out of double digits. So the seed for it was planted long ago. I just never acted on it. Then in 2002, one of my best friends, Fred Pfeil in Trinity’s English department, taught a free summer fiction writing course at the Hartford Public Library. I participated and caught the bug. I took an advanced fiction writing class with Lucy Ferriss, also at Trinity, where I learned a lot about structure, plotting, description, etc.

There was never a question that, if I were to write, I would write crime fiction. I’ve long been a fan of John le Carré and spy fiction has always interested me. Studying global issues, I was drawn to that. With one exception, every piece of fiction I’ve written so far is set abroad and/or involved some political aspect.

EB: As an academic, did you have to unlearn some things about writing when you turned to fiction?

MN: That goes without question. There are plenty of similarities, but writing an analysis of the role of abstract space in world politics is quite different than setting a scene or writing dialog. My writing went from presenting an argument to telling a story. The argument requires logical consistency, the story is more free flowing. I must say, though, that my last academic writing took on some of the qualities of story telling.

EB: Your professional training is in international studies, and you have written about migration in southern Africa, the AIDS pandemic, human rights and global trade. Have your research interests and travels informed your fiction?

MN: Yes, they are intricately connected. Everything I write benefits from what I have learned about the world. A common bit of writing advice is to write what you know, and that’s what I know. Much of my work and teaching was on Africa, specifically southern Africa, and several of my stories are set in Africa. The choice of a UN investigator as a protagonist turned out to be a great choice. It allows me to sent him all around the world without straining credulity. Since “Africa Always Needs Guns” I’ve sent him to the Golan Heights in Syria and to Yamoussoukro in the Côte d’Ivoire. Those stories are currently submitted and I’m waiting to hear. I’ve also started a novel featuring Vermeulen. It is set in Darfur, Sudan and centers on a kickback scheme involving the delivery of armored personnel carriers.

EB: What attracted you to Ashland? And how is it to be a writer here? Do you have a writer’s group? A routine? What’s your writing life like?

MN: We moved to Ashland in February 2008. I had a sabbatical, my wife had been here for a workshop earlier and suggested we come here. In September 2007, we lived here for a month to check it out and liked it so much that we quit our jobs and moved here. It was the best thing for my writing career. Going part-time as a professor gave me the time to focus on fiction writing. I joined a writing group headed by Tim Wohlforth right away and that the group has kept me writing.

My routine is less routine than I’d like. I try to write every weekday in the morning. Most of the time that works. Sometimes it doesn’t. Other interests come up, like learning how to create an iPhone app. In short, I’m not as serious about writing as I think I ought to be. But I don’t beat myself up about it.

EB: I know you are also working on a novel called Lincoln Road, set in South Africa. Can you tell us a little about that?

MN: Lincoln Road has gone through several stages of revision and is done. I’m seeking an agent but haven’t been successful yet. I’m also not as persistent about that as I ought to be.

The novel is set in Durban, South Africa. Musa Khumalo, the protagonist, is a poor squatter who ekes out a living fixing people’s cell phones and illegally connecting them to electricity. He is drawn into a conspiracy involving a corrupt city councillor who is selling off the land on which the squatters live to the highest bidder. He joins the protests, the councillor is killed and Musa is the key suspect. He’s got to clear is name and find the killer. There are car chases, abductions and a climactic scene right on the famous Durban beach front.

EB: Which do you prefer, the novel form or the short story?

MN: I like short stories. I like the opportunity to create a complete context where a crime occurs and is solved in 5,000 words. The form forces me to be judicious in my choice of words. But, as I said, there are very few outlets for short stories. Magazines are disappearing left and right. Yes, there are websites that publish short stories—I have a story (Kosi Bay) on Mysterial-E—but the vast majority of the websites don’t pay. Fifty years ago, a crime writer could live on short stories. These days are long gone.

Novels are big complex things. They require planning and structure, things that don’t come easily to me. But, as I said, I’m writing my second novel. Obviously there is something to it that keeps me coming back.

EB: You also have some expertise in technology issues and development. Do you have any thoughts on the impact of technology and e-publishing on authors and readers? Is it breaking down the barriers or opening the floodgates?

MN: The process of supplanting the traditional book with e-readers is well on its way. I’ve been an early adopter. I remember using a bulky e-reader back in the late nineties. It weight a lot but it let me take a bunch of public domain novels on vacation. I now own an iPad and use it frequently for reading all kinds of documents including novels.

The process of turning your writing into an ebook is easier than ever. My writing program let’s me export both in ePub (Nook, iBook and Sony) and Kindle format. Amazon has made it very easy to submit one’s books and so publishing has been democratized. Just check out the number of free or $0.99 novels for the Kindle reader. The gatekeeper function of agents and publishers has disappeared.

Is that good? Probably. Publishing has changed dramatically in the past two decades. As publishing houses consolidated, the need for profit (read bestsellers) trumped everything else. Being a mid-list author is no longer good enough. On the other hand, quantity does not mean quality. I’ve seen some poorly prepared novels. The plot might have been okay, but the lack of copyediting undermined my reading pleasure.

EB: Any advice for aspiring fiction writers?

MN:I’m not sure I’m the right person to give advice. I learned a lot from the classes I took. So, take classes, even at your local community college. There is a craft to writing that can be learned. I also find that it helps me not to think of my writing as better than it is. I know I still have a lot to learn and I know that even my third draft still has a lot of problems that require attention.

EB: What authors do you like to read?

MN: I’m re-reading John le Carré’s Karla trilogy at the moment and love the meandering pace of his writing. I enjoy Alan Furst’s spy novels set at the beginning of World War II. Stories set in Africa, especially by African authors always capture me. In the mystery genre there are Michael Stanley. Deon Meyer’s last novel Trackers was very well done. Chimamanda Adichie doesn’t write crime fiction, but Half a Yellow Sun is a wonderful novel set around the Biafra war of independence. Elsewhere in the world, there is a host of Scandinavian crime authors, Mankell, Nesbø, Olson who capture my interest. I’m always intrigued by William Gibson’s writing. His last trilogy has some of his best writing. Michael Chabon hasn’t let me down yet.

I could go on.

Posted in Interviews | Comments Off on An Interview with Michael Niemann

Bill Cameron’s Accidental Series

When is a series not a series? Bill Cameron explains how his novels–Lost Dog, Chasing Smoke, Day One, and County Line–have moved back and forth around an ensemble of central characters.

Posted in Interviews | Comments Off on Bill Cameron’s Accidental Series

An Interview with Courtney Pondelick

Courtney Pondelick is a Grants Pass native and a 2011 honors program graduate of Southern Oregon University. She’s worked as a manager at Bluestone Bakery, a student orientation leader, a journalist for the Siskiyou newspaper and the online magazine Cognito. She’s currently a student in the Masters in Book Publishing program at Portland State University.

EB: What is your graduate program like? What courses do you take and what sorts of things are you reading?

CP: The program is great! It’s extremely hands-on, even the traditional lecture classes tend to be really group-orientated and focus on direct, real-world skills. We are required to take courses such as book design, marketing, editing, copyright, and so much else, basically getting an overall look at what the book publishing industry is made up of. I have a much better idea of what my job options will be now that I’ve completed a quarter of classes.

As for reading? We are encouraged to read everything! A lot of my classmates are reading books, usually fiction, by local authors, and I would love to start on that as well. A big part of the program is staying up on industry news. This means subscribing to multiple daily newsletters from websites such as Publishers Weekly and Shelf Awareness. Oh, and right now, I’m reading Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy and Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson.

EB: Is there an internship or practicum component?

CP: What’s really wonderful about the program is the built-in internship component. The program, and everyone in it, essentially runs a non-profit publishing house, Ooligan Press. Ooligan publishes about three books per year, which means the students are actively involved with the process of acquiring, creating, and publishing a “real” book. By the time I graduate from the program, I will already have two years of directly relevant experience as I enter the job market. Students have their choice of which department they would like to work in. For example, last term I took one credit for the Digital Content workgroup, which manages the Ooligan website, creates ePub versions of Ooligan titles, and does digital marketing research. The students completely run the program. They are the project managers, leaders, and creators.

EB: What is the publishing scene like in Portland? Are you making good connections in the industry?

CP: It is incredible how dedicated the publishing community is in Portland. There have been serious strides toward sustainability in publishing, and Portland is really the perfect place for this to happen. Every day, there is someone having a poetry reading or a book release party. It definitely helps increase the sense of community, as living in a city can feel a bit isolated at times. It’s neat being able to directly interact with people who work at Dark Horse Comics, for example. I am aiming towards beginning an internship in the spring with a local publisher, although I haven’t yet pinned it down.

EB: How has your experience so far shaped your career goals?

CP: I’m learning to feel out exactly where my skills and passions lie. When I started the program, I was determined to become an editor, and although that is still my loftiest goal, I’m realizing that I would be happy in many other positions as well. I’ve developed an interest in interior book design, something I barely even noticed as a reader before, and I’m also realizing what I’m not very good at, namely marketing and web or ePub coding. Since I am only in my second quarter, my sense of what I would like to do career-wise will deepen as these next two years pass.

EB: How long does the program take to complete?

CP: The program takes approximately two years to complete, not counting summer classes. The program consists of 20 credits of required courses and 28 credits of electives. If I wanted, I could take most of my electives in graduate-level biology and create my own textbook company after I graduate. That’s not a great example, but my point is that there’s such an opportunity for personalization of the degree.

EB: Portland’s a pretty literary city. What does a book person do for fun?

CP: They spend time at Powell’s City of Books, of course! I live only ten blocks away, so I’m always there. I’ve attended several readings there so far and I’m always checking the event calendar for an author I might know of. On the top floor, there’s also a huge rare book room that’s only open certain hours, but it’s definitely worth a look. Other than Powells, there are lots of smaller bookstores and quite a few eclectic comic book shops. On any given night, there’s usually a reading of some sort happening, often at coffee shops and pubs.

EB: Can we check back with you down the road to see what’s new?

CP: Definitely!

EB: Thanks for talking with us.

CP: No problem. Thank you very much!

Posted in Interviews | Comments Off on An Interview with Courtney Pondelick

January’s Non-words of the Day

You can follow the Literary Ashland Non-word of the Day on Twitter (it’s easy).

First, some words that I wished I could have used. I wanted to used haberdash as a verb meaning “to run after a hat that has blown off your head.” But haberdash is already a verb (to deal in small things, hence haberdasher) and the Urban Dictionary lists it as meaning to jump into someone else’s photograph. I’m not quite ready to just redefine existing words. Too bad. Haberdash should mean chasing your hat.

And I wanted to use ginormal to mean something that is now normally larger than it used to be—supersized. But ginormal is in the Urban Dictionary as “Ginormously normal. 2: Something that is extremely average. 3: Something that is far from being out of ordinary.” Again, I like my definition better. The Urban Dictionary’s are, well, extremely average and far from being out of ordinary. But so far I haven’t come up with another word that fits the definition I had in mind. So feel free to use ginormal my way.

I hoped to use quatement and queech to refer to statements posing as questions and (still worse) speeches posing as questions (if you’ve ever attended an academic talk you know what I mean). But the Urban Dictionary already uses quatement to describe uptalk—statements made with question intonation. And queech is in there as well, with three meanings.

I toyed with using pubbub to mean “bar fight” but pubbub seemed to be in use already in other ways, so I switched it up to snubbub.

Some acknowledgements—textumble came from a conversation with geology professor Charles Lane about a year ago and has been rattling around in my head ever since (and it presented an interesting spelling challenge—textumble, texttumble, or textstumble, with a silent s). Improvision is based on a suggestion by my colleague Margaret Perrow. Every-which-wayiness is a compound that I overheard in a talk by linguist Lucy Thomason, who used it to refer to hair. I liked the idea of extending that to tangled arguments as well.

Thanks again to Rick Bleiweiss, Leroy Fulwiler and Lucia Hadella for their suggestions: travelostity, spamplitude and jobportunity. I wanted to use Mary Maher’s suggested neuterize, a synonym for neuter (with the wonderfully ironic redundant suffix), but the Urban Dictionary already had neuterize listed with the not-bad meaning of “To make men and women, and society, devoid of gender tendencies or characteristics in the attempt to eliminate feminity [sic.] and masculinity.” Hmm, feminity … a found non-word.

Here are January’s Non-Words:

    resolvevolvolution n. A new year’s resolution made many times before (from resolve +(re)volve+(resol)ution). 1 Jan

    exitstentialist n. paranoid fatalist who insists on being seated facing the door in restaurants. 2 Jan

    anakimbo adj. any human body position in which the hands are not on the hips with elbows pointed outward. 3 Jan

    caucauphony n. quadrennial noise from the Iowa caucuses, not to be confused with cawcawphony, a symphony of crows. 4 Jan

    frontlong adj. directed straight ahead, as in a frontlong glance. 5 Jan

    diaperarazzi n. paparazzo who specialize in photos of celebrities’ newborns. 6 Jan

    para-abnormal adj. a contranym meaning both normal and abnormally paranormal. 7 Jan

    orphography, n. – font styles that no one can read (eg, Kunstler Script). 8 Jan

    whych – interrogative pronoun (pronounced WHY-CH), which and why, as in “Whych do you prefer?” 9 Jan

    qweach, n. a speech disguised as a question, esp. one asked after an academic talk (also spelled queech, queach). 10 Jan

    textumble, v. or n. to fall up or down steps while texting, or the fall itself. 11 Jan

    dawndle, v. not getting out of bed when the alarm goes off (from dawn + dawdle). 12 Jan

    slurname, n. a surname which is homophonous with an ethnic, racial, sexual or other slur. 13 Jan

    bainstaking, n. or adj. extracting short-term profit through layoffs, factory closings, and planned bankruptcies. 14 Jan

    Jojones, n. addiction-like craving for deep-fried potato wedges. 15 Jan

    throught (pronounced THRAWT) n. a thought that makes you overly excited or anxious (from thought + wrought). 16 Jan

    virony, (pronounced VI-rony or VIR-ony), n. veiled irony expressed by females about or toward males. 17 Jan

    ropadopamine, n. neurotransmitter which produces a calmness that allows one to outlast one’s adversaries. 18 Jan

    precipapointment, n. the unfulfilled expectation of a snow day. 19 Jan

    begoogled, adj. lost for long stretches of time sifting through marginally relevant search results. 20 Jan

    every-which-wayiness, n. randomly tangled and protruding, used of both hair and argumentation. 21 Jan

    flabricate, v. to lie about one’s waist size or weight. 22 Jan

    banggage, n. political baggage resulting from past infidelities. 23 Jan

    improvision, n. the act of providing by improvising (or scrounging). 24 Jan

    soarical, adj. lyrical, lofty or aspirational but not to an icarian degree. 25 Jan

    snubbub, n. a noisy misunderstanding arising from a perceived slight. 26 Jan

    flossolalia, n. unintelligible speech that occurs when you talk to someone while flossing your teeth. 27 Jan

    travelostity, n. aimless driving that occurs when males refuse to read maps or ask directions (from Rick Bleiweiss). 28 Jan

    irrigorous, adj. 1. having low standards, easy, 2. extremely inaccurate. 29 Jan

    jobportunity, n. the opportunity to have a job [the p is silent] (suggested by Lucia Hadella). 30 Jan

    spamplitude, n. the ratio of spam to useful mail in your inbox (suggested by Leroy Fulwiler). 31 Jan

Got a favorite? Or a suggestion? Post a comment. Or email me at edbattistella followed by usual gmail stuff.

Posted in Language | Comments Off on January’s Non-words of the Day