Non-Word for October

Here you go…the non-words for October, with thanks to Robert Arellano, Jeremy Speer and Terry Rivas.

    hoardery, n. a large space (room, garage, basement, storage unit) where one stores presumed collectibles. 1 Oct

    domify, v. to build houses, with the intention of building community and culture. 2 Oct

    insobnia, n. the temperament that resists crying when it is appropriate to do so. 3 Oct

    recombobulate, v. to reorganize something that has fallen victim to entropy. 4 Oct

    paradigmatism, n. reflexive designation of old epistemologies as retrograde or novel ones as fads. 5 Oct

    flall v. to perform a desperate act badly; e.g., a failed Hail Mary pass. 6 Oct

    tuse, n. someone you friend on Facebook but don’t know personally, also tuser (one with many tuses). 7 Oct

    endashen, v. to replace commas or parens with dashes in a piece of writing–and by extension to overuse dashes. 8 Oct

    roit, n. an unidentified floating object (UFO) in a swimming pool. 9 Oct

    enterdisciplinary, adj. introductory methods, insights and protocols that prepare one for advanced study in a field. 10 Oct

    emerit, v. to honor retirees or others who are leaving an organization in good standing. 11 Oct

    tidysis, v. to do one’s housecleaning in the nude (from tidy + ecdysis). 12 Oct

    moralarkey, n. a facile assertion of one’s moral values to do something or avoid doing something. 13 Oct

    pavl, v. to condition someone to do something or behave in some way (hence the expression “to pavl into submission”). 14 Oct

    misprehend, v. to purposely misunderstand instructions in order to get more time or help for a task. 15 Oct

    gratzi, int. a way to both acknowledge and scold a grammar nazi who corrects you. 16 Oct

    acromynesia, n. confusion of two acronyms or the inability to remember what an acronym stands for (tks, Robt Arellano). 17 Oct

    malelujah! int. an expression of joy when someone you dislike unexpectedly and hugely fails (from mal + hallelujah). 18 Oct

    Googellian, adj. the impending total control of data by a supposedly benevolent infoverlord (thanks to Jeremy Speer). 19 Oct

    extendation, n. the act of growing larger (thanks to Terry Rivas). 20 Oct

    evertheless, conj. adv. to assert a possibly contrary point with a complementary sense (= moretheless, withstanding). 21 Oct

    409ers, n. people who obsessively clean their homes on the weekends and find it fulfilling and relaxing. 22 Oct

    supplete, v. to complete a thing by supplying a item from elsewhere (eg, using a salt shaker as a chess piece). 23 Oct

    metaphorganism, n. the use of organic metaphors to refer to inorganic or corporate entities (body politic, trailhead). 24 Oct

    survivisect, v. to do experimental surgery on part of an organism hoping the larger entity will more readily thrive. 25 Oct

    inflababble, adj. people who are able to eat whatever they like without gaining weight. 26 Oct

    transponyms, n. words that differ only in the switching of two letters, like “chai” and “chia”. 27 Oct

    galent, v. to pompously assume authority one does not have or has not earned.. 28 Oct

    resilofication, n. attempts by an organization to break down intellectual silos but which unintendedly create new ones. 29 Oct

    substand, v. to make a below average effort or to perform below average, but not quite failing, work. 30 Oct

    parasymptomnoia, n. assuming the worst about medical symptoms after consulting online health information and advice. 31 Oct

Posted in Ideas and Opinions | Comments Off on Non-Word for October

An Interview with Ken Lewis of Krill Press

Kenneth R. Lewis is a career law enforcement officer and author. Little Blue Whales, his 2009 crime thriller won the 2010 Public Safety Writers Association First Grand Prize for fiction. And his 2011 sequel The Sparrow’s Blade was awarded an Eric Hoffer Award in the category of Commercial Fiction. Watch for his next novel, The Helical Vane, scheduled for publication in the Fall of 2013. Ken is also the founder of Krill Press, a small independent publisher specializing in mysteries. You can follow Ken and Krill on Facebook.

EB: You’re a police chief and an author. When did you decide you were a writer? Have you always written?

KL: I think it was when I was in 6th Grade and was failing math miserably. I didn’t understand it, didn’t like it, and I didn’t want to understand it or like it because it was BORING. However, there was another class that I loved and that was English—particularly English Composition. For every D I racked up in math class, I could easily counterbalance it with an A in English, especially when the assignment was to write a short story, or a book report. I launched my writing career at Washington Elementary School that sixth grade year with publication (by my teacher, in English class) of my short story “The Forest Ranger” the thrilling tale of a stoic Garry Cooper-like forest ranger who lived in a small mountain town, and who was battling unruly and intoxicated town ruffians trying to run him off while at the same time trying to save the town from a deadly, marauding mountain lion, and also win the heart of the local school marm. I’m pretty sure my work at that time was heavily influenced by both Gunsmoke, and The Andy Griffith Show. However, it still brought my D average in math up to a B-. I sold my first short story, “The Willow Tree,” to a magazine called Farm Wife News for fifty dollars when I was twenty-one.

EB: How did you come to be a publisher?

KL: It was out of both necessity, and a strong sense of parental responsibility. In 2006 I joined an organization called Willamette Writers for the sole purpose of attending their annual summer conference that year and, hopefully, finding an agent for my first novel, Little Blue Whales. I did find an agent, and over the next two years we came really close to selling Little Blue Whales and at one point, we had a verbal acceptance from St. Martin’s Press, pending a rewrite to get the word count of the book down from its original bloated 178,000 words. Eight months, and seventy-six thousand words less later, we returned to St. Martin’s with a leaner, meaner version of Little Blue Whales which was ten times the book the first version was but the economy had soured and the Big New York Publishers just weren’t buying anything from unknowns. Over lunch at the 2008 Willamette Writers Conference my agent suggested I “forget” about Little Blue Whales and write something else, but I couldn’t do that.

Writing a novel is like creating and giving birth to a child. You wouldn’t leave your two-year old on a curb somewhere with a sign saying “Please take care of my baby. I’ve moved on to something else.” would you? In the middle of buttering my sourdough roll, I calmly informed my agent that if the only thing standing in the way of getting Little Blue Whales published was lack of a publisher, then I would simply learn the publishing business. After all, publishing wasn’t exactly rocket science, was it? This was in August of 2008, and I incorporated Krill Press the following month on September 17, 2008. Our first mystery title, Absinthe of Malice, by Pat Browning, was published on November 13, 2008. The name Krill Press is taken from a scene in Little Blue Whales which talks about how the largest mammal on earth, the blue whale, is totally dependent on one of the smallest creatures in the ocean, a nearly microscopic shrimp called krill, and how these behemoths of the sea would perish from the earth without the krill, which is their mainstay food source. It is obviously a metaphor for why we need small publishers in the literary world, and it is also a great conversation topic at cocktail parties. It makes people believe I am cleverer than I really am. By the way, Little Blue Whales, the novel my agent suggested that I just forget about and move on to something else, was published by Krill Press in 2009, and in 2010 it won the Public Safety Writers Association First Grand Prize for Fiction.

EB: You’ve described Krill Press as a micropublisher? Is that like a microbrewery for books?

KL: Yes, exactly! We are even smaller than a traditional small press, publishing only five to seven titles a year, and not because we want to, but because this is the maximum workload the press can accept at this time with the resources we have on hand. If I ever gave up my day job, I would imagine we could double, or even triple that number of titles published every year, but I’m not ready to do that quite yet. However, there is no lack of material out there, even with the explosion of self-publishing in these last few years due to the revolution in digital publishing. Anyone can publish a book now, but not everyone can find a publisher, to publish their book, and many authors still hold having a publisher for their work, in very high regard. This is why, on our website, we are always “closed to submissions” because the few times we have changed the message to “open for submissions” we have literally been flooded, overwhelmed, with author queries.

EB: As a publisher what do you look for in a manuscript? In an author?

KL: I like to say that good writing is like pornography…you know it when you see it. Or, in the case or manuscripts, you know it when you read it. After being a publisher for five years now, I have developed my own internal rating system I like to call the Triple A System in which, after reading the first fifty pages of a manuscript (but in reality, usually the first two or three pages), I am able to rate a submission as either Awful, Amateurish, or Awesome. I really don’t get many “Awful” manuscripts. The most predominant category seems to be the “Amateurish” ones, manuscripts from authors who are trying very hard at their writing, and some who eventually may even make it…just not this time around. The “Awesome” manuscripts jump right out at you, and it’s like being hit square between the eyes with a baseball bat!

This summer, Krill Press was invited by Willamette Writers to be on their coveted Agent, Editor, Film List as an acquiring publisher actively seeking new writing talent. Besides being in a way, a very weird experience, sitting in the opposite chair as a publisher at the same tables and in the same I sat as an author six years before, hoping to get a book deal myself, it was also a heartwarming, heart wrenching, and sobering experience! Fourteen authors signed up to pitch their mystery books to Krill Press, and I requested the first fifty pages of every author’s novel who pitched to me, of which, so far, eight authors have. Of the eight submissions, one was awful, four were amateurish, and three were awesome. Of the three awesome novels, one, Dysphoria, by Karelia Stetz-Waters, was contracted for on Friday, September 28, 2012, and will be published in January 2013. The other two submissions are still being considered, and both stand a good chance at this point of going to contract, but Dysphoria was definitely that baseball bat smack between the eyes! It truly is an “awesome” book, as are all of our other Krill Press titles currently in print. As for what I look for in an author? I have very little choice in that selection, because they always seem to come with the book as a package deal! Just kidding. All of the authors I have now, and have had in the past, are terrific people. However, if you are some sort of jackass as an author, or turn out to eventually be one, no matter how awesome your manuscript may be you are ultimately not going to be published or retained by Krill Press.

EB: What been the most important lesson you’ve learned in starting a publishing company?

KL: That publishing really is, in a way, rocket science! I was so naive when I started this business; I had absolutely no idea what I was getting myself into. However, my love of good books, and the fact that I made promises to people, bound myself to them, and their precious books by virtue of legal, written contracts, made me learn how to be a publisher. I don’t like failing, in anything that I do, and I can honestly say that in the five short years that Krill Press has been in existence, we are much more of a success story than we are in any respect a failure. We are starting to build a really good reputation in the writing community, and authors are now seeking us out, specifically, to see if there is a possibility that we may be interested in publishing their book.

EB: Are you still finding time to write or are you spending more time as a publisher?

KL: Honestly? I have been spending more time as a publisher than I have on my own writing. I mean, look how long it took me to get this simple little interview to you, Ed! I also do a yearly blog piece for Kay Barley on her great writer’s site, Meanderings and Musings. These are scheduled a year in advance…a whole year! Mine is set to appear tomorrow, September 30, yet last weekend, at this same time, I was still busting my butt to finish it. I finally did finish it, the next night, and emailed it to Kaye because she needs to get them at least a week in advance. It has been almost two years since The Sparrow’s Blade was published, and I am still in the research phase for my next novel, The Helical Vane, which is set in Idaho and is about baking and archery. I am making my second research trip in two years to Idaho next month, and I have pledged to turn off the Krill Press spigot this winter, after getting our next three books into print, and concentrate solely on finishing at least the first draft of The Helical Vane before next summer.

EB: How have ebooks changed things for publishers?

KL: I’m not entirely sure, definitively, because as a publisher we have always brought out Kindle and NOOK editions of our print books, simultaneously. I can tell you this: for every 1 of our print books sold, we sell approximately 50 eBooks of that same title. My sense of things, though, is that it has probably dramatically and irrevocably changed the traditional publishing model in this country forever. One negative factor, however, has been wannabe authors who are so anxious, so desperate to have anyone read their work, that they started the “free eBook” craze which has ended up hurting everyone—publishers and authors alike. And not just wannabe authors, but some fairly “big name” authors too! All of our eBook editions are priced at $2.99, the current, acceptable price point for Kindle and NOOK downloads. We have experimented in the past with having some of our eBooks on “special” at 0.99 for a short period of time, but never any lower. As far as I am concerned, 0.99 is free! Especially when you consider the print version of that same book sells for $16.99.

EB: You also do great cover designs. What are the elements of a good design?

KL: I love creating book covers. Absolutely love it! I can’t draw for crap, but give me a computer loaded with Corel-Draw, and access to a few online stock photo companies, and I can create a cover design that makes people want to pick that book up off the book store shelf and thumb through it, or hit the “Click To Look Inside!” icon on Amazon.com. That age-old adage about not being able to judge a book by its cover is definitely out the window at Krill Press , because we want you to get a sense about what is inside those covers. We do that by designing strictly high quality, custom covers, which are always tied to some key scene, or meaningful reference in the book…even to the point of having the author slightly rework a scene, or a passage in their manuscript so the cover is a perfect fit.

In our most recently published title, Lies at Six, by Sarah Scott, her novel opens with one of her characters sipping a glass of Jack Daniel’s as he looks out his living room window in Memphis at the winter sun setting over the Mississippi River. The novel itself is predominantly about Jolie Marston, a former Memphis TV anchor trying to solve the murder of a friend, and who now finds herself in exile after having a meltdown on live TV. So shouldn’t the front cover be filled with all kinds of frenetic images of the fast-paced life of a popular female TV personality, and all of the glamour and glitz that goes with that kind of lifestyle? Instead—and in keeping with our belief that “less is often more” when it comes to designing incredible book covers—the front cover of Lies at Six is a dark and moody shot of a tugboat silently plying the muddy waters of the Mississippi at dusk, with the title of the book in a large font that is filled with the colors of the sunset. Turn the book over, and on the back cover, you will find ample representation of who Jolie Marston is and what she has got herself into.

Or take a look at our most recently designed cover for book #2 in Ashland, OR author Tim Wohlforth’s Jim Wolfe private eye noir series, Epitaph For Emily, and compare it to the cover of book #1, No Time To Mourn. Both covers evoke the area of operations Wolfe works in—the San Francisco, Oakland, Berkeley area—and all of them, including the yet to be written book #3, will be tied together by the distinctive “wolf eyes” banner at the bottom of each cover. Cover design is definitely the best part of my job as a publisher, and it also saves the business anywhere from $500.00 to $1,500.00 per book by designing our own covers in-house, not to mention the added value of getting exactly what we want for each individual book. All of our covers can be seen on our website, www.krillpress.com.

EB: How can readers get Krill Press books?

KL: Krill Press print books can be purchased direct from nearly every online bookseller, or ordered through your local bookstore using the book’s ISBN number, and eBook editions are available from Amazon Kindle, Barnes and Noble NOOK, and Google eBooks. For bookstores, other retail outlets, and book clubs, our titles are distributed through Ingram, or you can order directly from us using our own in-house distribution program called Krill Direct, which includes generous wholesale discounts, and an accommodation for returns with certain conditions. Send us an email query to orders@krillpress.com if you are interested.

Posted in Interviews | Comments Off on An Interview with Ken Lewis of Krill Press

What does “clean” mean?

Over the summer, my wife and I visited Don Aslett’s Museum of Clean in Pocatello, Idaho. It’s a six-floor 75,000 square foot museum devoted to the art of cleaning. The Museum is the brainchild of Don Aslett, the founder and chairman of Varsity Contractors, a nationwide cleaning services provider.

Aslett was at the museum when we visited and led the tour himself. He’s a fit and funny eighty-something guy who like to present himself as “just an old janitor who loves to work.” Of course he’s a savvy CEO who built a $250 million dollar a year company and marketed a line of cleaning products as well. And he’s written dozens of books on cleaning, organizing and business (and a bio, of course: Cleaning Up for a Living).

Standing in the four-faced clock tower above the sixth floor, I suppressed the urge to ask who’ll clean your clock? But I did start thinking about the word clean. It was hard not to.

What does clean mean? It’s early, partly obsolete, meanings overlapped with clear and meant pure. We still retain some uses of clean with this sense of absoluteness or completeness, like when the wind tears a roof clean off.

In its primary use though, clean is an adjective, defined as the absence of something impristine–dirt, dust, strains, grease, debris, typos and infelicities. What’s interesting is that the something impristine varies according to the noun that clean is applied to. Clean clothes are free of dirt. A clean toilet is free of stains. A clean window is free of dirt and streaks. A clean fight follows the rules—it’s free of low blows and headbutts. A clean office can be free of disarray or free of dirt. Clean government is free of corruption. A clean manuscript is free of markings. You get the idea. The value of the core meaning is precisely its relativity.

Clean is also a verb. It’s the process of making something clean. We have a whole scrub-bucket of words for that, of course, including wash, soak, shampoo, shower, bathe, scrub, scour, dust, mop, sweep, swif, and squeegee. You can engage in the process without achieving the result—we’ve all had the experience of washing something and finding that it’s not clean.

Clean also anchors the two-word verbs like clean up and clean out. What do the little particles add to the meaning? There’s a difference between cleaning up your room and cleaning your room. In the first case, you are restoring order—clothes off the floor, junk of the bed and chairs, things put away. In the second, you are vacuuming, wiping the mirror, dusting, and so on. In a nutshell, it’s the difference between making the bed and changing the sheets. When we clean out something (a closet, a garage, cabinets), we restore order by getting rid of unneeded items. And when someone in charge cleans house, that’s reorganization, not picking up.

What’s the difference between clean and cleanse? Cleanse was at one time the more common verb but now has adopted a ritual-religious sense—you cleanse your soul or chalices but you clean your plate. Cleanse also contains a sense of thoroughness that you find in expression like cleansing cream or colon cleanse. And it has an ugly extension in the term ethnic cleansing.

We use clean in all sorts of metaphors and idioms, from the picturesque clean your clock to the mysterious clean as a whistle, To clean the clock builds on 19th century slang usage of clean to mean drub and dates back at least to this example from Trenton Evening Times in 1908: “It took the Thistles just one inning to clean the clocks of the Times boys.”

Clean as a whistle probably developed as a variant of clear as a whistle (whistles not being known for their cleanliness). And clean as a hound’s tooth is perhaps reinterpreted from a use of clean to mean sharp. Hounds’ teeth are even less clean than whistles.

Posted in Ideas and Opinions, Language | Comments Off on What does “clean” mean?

Non-words for September

Here are September’s Non-Words, with thanks to Mary Williams, Heidi Dalgarno, Robert Arellano, the late Wilkins-O’Reilly Zinn, and William della Santina. There are a couple of bonus words in the definitions too, like spoonerize and illiteral. (Illiterally should mean not literal, except of course when literally is used as a contranym.) I had a tough time choosing between hopelessless and hopelessnessless, which should mean different things. I learned a few new real words, like studentry, an old word for student body which deserves revival, finick (to be affectedly refined), and advertence (heedfulness) as well as some neologisms coined by others, like hoi olligoi (on the polloi pattern).

The words:

    gleeflect, v. to gleefully deflect other points of view with sarcasm, irony and snark to play to one’s audience. 1 Sep

    beloathed, adj. families or groups joined, Hatfield/McCoy-like, in multi-generational hatred. 2 Sep

    xeratask, v., to sit in the dry, warm, end-of-summer sunshine, doing nothing. 3 Sep

    etymologue: one who confuses etymological faithfulness with precise usage. 4 Sep

    impristine, adj. having a minute bit of dirt, error, or some other natural flaw that is noticeable but barely so. 5 Sep

    werror, n. (pronounced wee-rer) a metaphorical mirror in which we see our collective, illiteral reflection. 6 Sep

    twithear and overread, v. to overhear on Twitter (twithear) or on Facebook (overread, thanks to Mary Williams). 7 Sep

    thunklessness, n. the combination of malice and weakness that makes one a bully. 8 Sep

    gogamagog, n. any large but unidentifiable outdoor sculpture; may also refer to buildings. 9 Sep

    homescape, n. the landscape of a home and what the arrangement and display of things reveals (thx to Heidi Dalgarno). 10 Sep

    factuum, n. (pr. “fact-yoom”) a fact-free zone in politics characterized by misrepresentation, not facts. 11 Sep

    psoeuvre, n. (pronounced “psoover”) the pseudonymous works of a writer. 12 Sep

    detreat, v. to recover one’s equilibrium and catch up on work after a week of strategic planning retreats. 13 Sep

    gwid, n. (pronounced “gweed”) someone who is malleable but also quick to understand what is going on. 14 Sep

    anticdote, n. a story of personal hijinks told as an ice-breaker in a public speaking situation (tks Robert Arellano). 15 Sep

    humbiliate, v. to humiliate oneself by being excessively humble. 16 Sep

    debitnaire, adj. an image of class or breeding established on borrowed money. 17 Sep

    falquism, n. to overly value autonomy versus interdependence; to work in silos (from the Latin “fala,” a siege tower). 18 Sep

    nilieu [pr. nil-you] an environment or setting in which nothing much is happening. 19 Sep

    herdonism, to be pleasure-seeking in a totally conformist fashion; to follow the hedonistic herd. 20 Sep

    convocative, adj. oratory which simultaneously reassures, exhorts and provokes. 21 Sep

    blandemonium, n. irrational enthusiasm for something exceedingly ordinary—food, entertainment, books, etc. 22 Sep

    collectory, n. autoethnographic research by purposefully repurposing found objects (from Wilkins-O’Reilly Zinn). 23 Sep

    triple-dog, adj. anything daring or edgy but apt to pull in many directions (idea from William della Santina). 24 Sep

    liviousness, sensitivity to the feelings, needs and desires of others (backformed from obliviousness). 25 Sep

    hopelessless, adj. not exactly hopeful, but lacking hopelessness; having an average amount of hope. 26 Sep

    perfexhibitionist, n. one who flaunts his or her perfectionism as an excuse to procrastinate. 27 Sep

    assessin, n. one who removes the joy from something by measuring it. 28 Sep

    indubiate, v. to cause to doubt (when used as a noun, a group whose legitimacy is called into doubt). 29 Sep

    tumbletongued, adj. prone to misspeak, malaprop, or spoonerize. 30 Sep

Posted in Ideas and Opinions | Comments Off on Non-words for September