What I’m Reading

I’ve been working on various things and so slacking off on “What I’m Reading,” but here is some catch-up.

Standing by the Wall and The Secret Hours by Mick Herron – The further and past adventures of Jackson Lamb and the denizens of Slough House, where spy careers go to die. The Secret Hours fills in the important backstory of one key character…enough said.

Ozark Dogs by Eli Cranor

I picked this up as an impulse buy and it was great. Murder and feuding in a small Ozark community, with meth dealing white supremacists, a tough Vietnam vet trying to raise a granddaughter and terrific supporting. If you like S. A. Cosby, you’ll like Ozark Dogs.

Razorblade Tears and Blackton Wasteland by S. A. Cosby

Speaking of Cosby. Razorblade Tears is a fast-paced story retribution where two unlikely ex-cons—Ike and Buddy Lee, one Black and one white, search for the murderers of their gays sons who were married. The plotting is intricate and we get to watch Ike and Buddy Lee grow to be better men even as they mete out violent justice.

Blacktop Wasteland is another intricately plotted and bloody story of fathers and sons, featuring Beauregard “Bug” Montage, a getaway driver gone straight who gets tempted into one last heist. It all goes wrong and Bug needs to salvage what he can as his choices put his family at risk

Next up, Cosby’s My Darket Prayer. I’m reading them in reverse order.

London Séance Society by Sarah Penner Read this one for my book club. The alternating narrative made the story a bit hard to follow (murder in the fake seance work of the late 19th century) and the authors seem to have left no plot device unused.

Dogwhistles and Figleaves by Jennifer Mather Saul

Reviewed this one for CHOICE but I may do a longer post at some point. The author brings together the spread of explicit racism and the normalization of blatant falsehoods, showing how the two reinforce one another in different ways to different audience.  The  plural really should be “figleafs” though.

Mother tongue: The Surprising History of Women’s Words by Jenni Nuttall

Also reviewed this for CHOICE. It’s a terrific history of the etymologies of words used to describe women’s word, experiences, and bodies.

The Riddles of the Sphinx : Inheriting the Feminist History of the Crossword Puzzle by Anna Shechtman

Schectman combined the history of gender in crosswords with a personal memoir of her anorexia, which I wasn’t expecting!? She somehow makes it work and I especially enjoy the bios of Ruth Hale (of Algonquian Round Table fame) and the linguist Julia Penelope.

Yellowface by R. F. Kuang

A literary tale of cultural appropriation and scandal that is only part satire. There were times when I was rooting for Juniper song and times when I was disgusted by her.

On Disinformation by Lee McIntyre Good enough and useful, but a bit disappointing in its preachiness and lack of depth.

Dark Angel and Judgement Prey by John Sanford

I’d been putting off the Letty Davenport series thinking they wouldn’t hold up to the Lucas Davenport and Virgil Flowers books. But I was wrong; they are just as compelling in the characterization, plotting, and pace.

Hero by Thomas Perry

Page-turner story of a young female bodyguard targeted by a hitman and his mob boss. Thomas Perry at his best.

On my summer reading list:

  • The Ministry of Time by Kaliane Bradley
  • Clete and Another Kind of Eden by James Lee Burke
  • Honey by Victor Lodato
  • The Bear Went Over the Mountain by William Kotzwink;le
  • The Three Body Problem by Cixin Liu
Posted in Ideas and Opinions, What People Are Reading | Comments Off on What I’m Reading

Ashley Dippel at the Sundance Film Festival 2024 (a guest post)

Attending the Sundance Film Festival 2024 was my friend’s idea. He said he had always wanted to attend and that this was the year. As a sucker for road trips, good movies and time with friends, I made it my mission as well. We recruited two others, booked a budget Airbnb and made the twelve-hour drive in a 2009 Honda CR-V. 

We spent the first two days in Park City, Utah to catch the Sundance Lights at their brightest. The snowy nightlife was alive in a way I’d never seen. We kicked off the weekend at the Alpine Distillery Social Aid & Pleasure Club, a swanky underground bar with communal seating and fruity cocktails. The following days of the festival, I spent my time writing poetry, exploring Salt Lake City, and watching film makers share their masterpieces with the public for the first time.

The films moved me, the camaraderie of my friends brought me to tears, and the fresh breath of Utah’s crisp air gave my body the reset it needed to start the year off right. The weekend’s keylight shines directly on the creative and connecting atmosphere that the Sundance Film Festival and its attendees created. While it’s not about the destination, Salt Lake City was a beautiful backdrop for the journey Sundance brought me. It is a journey that will live in my heart until my dying day.

Posted in Ideas and Opinions | Comments Off on Ashley Dippel at the Sundance Film Festival 2024 (a guest post)

What I’m Reading

How to Talk Language Science with Everybody by Laura Wagner and Cecile McKee.

This book should be required reader for every PhD and master’s student in linguists. Wagner and McKee explain how to build the necessary skills to communicate language science (really any science or technical field) to general public. Those of us who have fumbled when trying to explain linguistics to family members, friends, reports, and colleagues and administrators will appreciate the well organized and systematic presentation. In twenty bite-sized chapters – with plenty of examples – the authors explain how and why the of generating interest, building credibility and scaffolding knowing about linguistics to a variety of audiences. Wish I had had this when I first started teaching, back in the last century.

The Gentle Art of Verbal Self-Defense (1980) , Success with the Gentle Art of Verbal Self-Defense, (1989) The Last Word on the Gentle Art of Self-Defense, by Suzette Haden Elgin (1987)

A few years ago I picked up these three books in a thrift shop. I had known about Elgin’s work and occasionally taught her linguistic science fiction and Laadan, so I thought someday I’d read through my investment. The three books are a sort of applied linguistics—or applied semantics more exactly—focusing on way to recognize conversational presuppositions in interactions. More importantly, the books suggest how to challenge presuppositions to redirect (or derail) conversations that are unproduction. Elgin sets things up by taking about various modes of interaction: the placate, the blamer, the computer, the distracter, and the leveler (based on Virgina Satir’s psychotherapeutic model) and shows how different modes respond to verbal aggression.

As you can infer from the titles, the books are written in the self-help style, with sample conversations, journaling exercises, and so on. Some of the scenarios seem clunky, but overall ones get a nice set of examples of thinks like “I you really wanted me to get an A in math, you’d buy me a calculator” or “Even a nurse ought to be able to tell I’m really in a lot of pain.” Elgin touches on power networks and charisma and has special chapters “For men” For women” and “For College students” in the 1980s).

Success … is a bit more interesting linguistically, with discussion of factives, metaphor, time adverbs, and more., with a long section on language and public relations. The Last Word … adds in the idea of sensory modes from the Neurolinguistic Programming Work of Grinder and Bandler and introduces something called Syntonics which involves matching the sensory mode of others. Throughout the three books Elgin blends in linguistic ideas, with advice on

The most fun idea was what she called “the twirk” referring to language that calls attention to itself as a means of creating a distraction. I had thought I would skim the books and discard them, but I think I’ll hold onto them, just in case….

Spassky’s Best Games: A Chess Biography by Alexey Bezgodov and Dmitry Aleynikov

Boris Spassky is one of my chess heroes—I was rooting for him to beat Fischer (both times). Bezgodov and Aleynikov’s biography (pp 15-148) answers paints a comprehensive profile of Spassky’s life and career, and it answers some of the questions I’ve always had. We see Spassky’s intellectual and rebellious side, questioning communist orthodoxy, his need for father figures like Zak and Bondarevsky, his periodic laziness in preparation but also his deep understanding of the finding the critical moment in a game, his overload and burnout as world champion. We also see his sportsmanship and too acquiescent respect for Fischer as well as Spassky’s relationships with players like Tal, Korchnoi, and Karpov. And we see Spassky’s post championship life and career as a not quite expatriate Russian and chess ambassador. Spassky has written little of his own biography—and at this stage probably won’t—so this volume is likely to remain the definitive work for a time. The 61 “best games” portion of the book (pp 155-274) includes both familiar and less games of Spassky’s including the famous game with Bronstein that appeared in the was used in From Russia with Love.

Razorblade Tears by S. A. Cosby

Continuing my way through S. A. Cosby’s books with Razorblade Tears. It’s a fast-paced story of two ex-cons, one black and one white, whose gays sons are killed in an apparent hate crime. Ike and Buddy Lee do what has to be done and uncover secrets within secrets. It’s noir at its best.

Winter Counts by David Heska Wanbli Weiden

Set on and around the Rosebud Sioux Reservation, Winter Counts follows Virgil Wounded Horse, who provides street justice for wrongs the legal system won’t address. He a Lakota of mixed ancestry, dealing with the prejudices of white people and full blooded Lakotas. His latest client is close to home—his own nephew – and Virgil and his girlfriend Marie get involved tracking down drug gangs and other unsavory characters to keep Nathan safe. Good action, a twisty plots, nice sense of place, and subtle commentary on Native life. Weiden has promised another novel and I’ll be watching for it.

Red Queen by Bourne Morris

A quick-moving and engaging murder mystery set in a journalism school. Plenty of academic rivalries to drive the story – and for a change the killer isn’t the provost. Wherever you are you’ll recognize a colleague or two.

Who Killed Truth? by Jill Lepore

You can’t go wrong with Jill Lepore. In this podcast/audiobook Who Killed Truth? she tackles epistemology through a wide-ranging series of explorations of lesser known events in the history of evidence—from the use of lie detectors in court, a history of meteorology, to the use of vaccines for combat polio and the 1976 swine flu, to climate science, women’s right and the Scopes trial, and World War II propaganda. No philosophers were harmed in this podcast.

 

 

Posted in Ideas and Opinions, What People Are Reading | Comments Off on What I’m Reading

An Interview with David G. Lewis, author of Tribal Histories of the Willamette Valley

David G. Lewis is a specialist in the history of Kalapuyans and other Western Oregon tribes which he has been studying for more than two decades. A member of the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde, a descendant of the Santiam, Takelma and Chinook peoples, he has an extensive record of publications and collaborative projects with regional scholars, tribes, local governments, and communities. Lewis has a PhD in anthropology from the University of Oregon and is an Assistant Professor of anthropology and Indigenous studies at Oregon State University. He is a former Cultural Department Manager of the Grande Ronde Tribe.

He currently resides in Chemeketa, now Salem, Oregon, with his wife, Donna, and two sons, Saghaley and Inatye.

Ed Battistella: Congratulations on your book Tribal Histories of the Willamette Valley, which was really eye-opening for me. You documented a lot of history that we often don’t hear about, like the slave trade in Oregon, the passbook system in the late 1800s and the path to US citizenship. What was the research process like—and what was most surprising to you?

David G. Lewis: This took some time. I was initially only studying Grand Ronde tribal histories then some 12 years ago branched out to all western Oregon and so much opened up for me. The histories of all the tribes and reservations are linked in many ways. I found that I could not study only one tribe, because then the history did not include the interrelationships we all have in treaties, US Indian policies, and events of the time.

EB: You describe what you call “an alternative history of Native peoples in the Willamette Valley,” what do you mean by that?

DGL: Well, I think we all are aware that most histories have been and are written without Native people involved in them, few native people are consulted and in early histories our people are completely discounted. So, this represents the other “alternative perspective” those of Native people not seen in most histories. I hope this becomes mainstream as people realize how little of US history has been told. I tried to get to Native perspectives as much as possible as they lost land, people, rights, and struggled through generations of mistreatment. This all stands counter to “normal” US histories that have aggrandized the actions and intents of the settlers.

EB: How have attempts to engage with and present Native history evolved?

DGL: I think changes come when I make new discoveries or gain a new perspective. Two years ago I found a bunch of census counts most scholars had never used or perhaps seen before. These became available when UO and OHS Library put the Palmer papers online. This find opened up the events of 1855 and 1856 and showed me the exact daily movement of the tribes from living in their traditional lands to the reservations at Grand Ronde. From this my ideas changed, and this has begun to change the written history of the tribes. Then about 3 years ago I found 2 new pages belonging to the Willamette Valley Treaty- never mentioned before in scholarship. This brought 5 tribes to the treaty in microfilm records, and this opened the history of treaty-making a lot. Some 15 years ago I found the Grand Ronde Passbook in the Siletz collection at OHS library, and it seems that now whenever I delve into an archive, I find something new that can answer key questions in Tribal history. Just recently the National Archives made their maps and treaty files available for digital download online, I have not fully investigated this, but the maps are in color now, in high definition, and new placenames and details are emerging that can address Native history. As new resources are available, made available through technology and innovation this opens up the possibilities of research quite a bit, makes it easier with less barriers to finding the actual history. I, no longer must travel to archives to find documents, there is now a good record online, and this is dramatically altering the ways history can be researched.

EB: Who is your ideal reader? It seems to me that Tribal Histories of the Willamette Valley would be a great text for courses in Native history and in Oregon history.

DGL: Yes, exactly. I initially wanted this to be a text for high school students, but the book can easily be for college. I also wanted to not have too much academic jargon, a more narrative style with some personal perspectives in it. It is a more accessible text for a wider audience. I have heard from readers that this is appreciated.

EB: I had not heard of the Grande Ronde Guard. What was that?

DGL: Another discovery. For about a month and a half, Joel Palmer hired about 60 men to guard the reservation from white settlers. There were lots of rumors of people in the Willamette Valley who were going to attempt genocide on the tribes, in retribution for the “Indian Wars.” Governor Curry was not a friend to the Tribes and his militias were committing genocides in Southern Oregon and Washington Territory. They were also upset Palmer had placed the tribes near the valley and I think a few settlers feared the tribes would band together and attack the valley, something which never happened. Palmer put good plans in place to hire these guards, build a fence, and protect the Natives. They were disbanded on May after it was clear the threat was not going to manifest. But Palmer did the right thing to protect the people and for this he should be honored.

EB: You document some instances in which there are parallel histories of events, different accounts from different tribes or different groups of settlers. What can we learn from those parallel histories?

DGL: There has been a lot of rewriting and reconfiguring of history by historians, sometimes to fulfill their vision of an “American National History.” This has altered many histories of Native peoples significantly. Sometimes histories have been written with contemporary politics in mind. Because of these different agendas we end up with a lot of parallel histories, which do not match up. I really try to keep politics out of my history, I was not funded by any entity to write this history, this is purely my creation based on what I have found in records. No support for this came from Grand Ronde, the tribe I am enrolled in.

EB: What other scholarly projects are you working on?

DGL: For some years now, I have been working on an edited volume Kalapuyans of Western Oregon with fellow editors Tom Connelly and Henry Zenk. This volume will have essays from a number of scholars, archaeologists, linguists, historians, both tribal and non-tribal. I want to submit the manuscript to OSU press next summer. I have additional histories of the Kalapuyans in this volume which is a bit more academically focused. I also have plans for a reworking of my dissertation to tell the history of termination from the tribal perspective. I have had a hard time finding many of those perspectives but I know where many oral accounts are now.

EB: What was the process of working with Ooligan Press like? They’ve produced a very handsome book.

DGL: It was interesting, every term there were new students to work with, over the course of two years they did an excellent job at all aspects of the manuscript. It works for a non-academic text, if it were more academic, I think a more intense editorial process would be better. But the suggestions they made to have personal experiential essays, to create the cover out of Greg Robinson’s art, and to help recreate maps were all very helpful. Their timeline was helpful too, to keep me on track to complete the book.

EB: Thanks for talking with us.

DGL: Thank you for reaching out, I think this book will make waves in Tribal history and I know the histories of the tribes here will never be the same. I feel in many ways like I am giving back to the community for the tribe supporting my education, and to other tribes who worked with me on projects throughout the years. As a Native person I feel a strong responsibility to work on behalf of the Native community. And I think this book does that.

Posted in Ideas and Opinions, Interviews, What People Are Reading | Comments Off on An Interview with David G. Lewis, author of Tribal Histories of the Willamette Valley