What’s new in Literary Ashland?

What’s new in Literary Ashland?

It’s banned book week, of course, and you know what to do.

New York Times’s critic Sam Anderson’s talk is coming up this Thursday at North Medford High. No banning Sam. It’s sponsored by the Jackson County Library Foundation and was featured in a nice article by John Darling in the Medford Mail Tribune and Ashland Daily Tidings.

Next Friday October 7, at 6 pm, the mystery writing team of Michael Sears and Stanley Trollip will be at Bookwagon (1652 Ashland Street). They collaborate as Michael Stanley (get it) to write a series of mysteries set in Botswanna. Michael Niemann, international economist, will introduce will talk about Botswana politics, trade and culture on Sunday October 2 at 2p at the Ashland Public Library.

Congratulations to Amy MacLennan whose chapbook The Fragile Day was recently released by Spire Press in New York. It should be available soon at Bloomsbury Books in Ashland.

And coming soon on Literary Ashland: a selection of our SPAM, Alyssa Zysett’s bookstore tour, and our Twitter strategy unveiled. Tell your friends to follow us.

Posted in Literary Events in Southern Oregon | Comments Off on What’s new in Literary Ashland?

Bill Cameron on Day One

Day OnePortland novelist Bill Cameron writes sharp-edged and gritty mysteries set mostly in Portland (next to Chelsea Cain, he is Portland’s scariest writer). His recent book County Line was featured in the May issue of the Atlantic Monthly. His 2010 Day One was set in both southern Oregon and Portland and features a teen runaway named Eager Gillespie, an abused wife fleeing her husband and father-in-law, a villain who attended Southern Oregon University, and Cameron’s engaging character Skin Kadish.

Here’s a clip from our 2010 Ashland Mystery interview.

More Bill Cameron in the weeks to come.

Posted in Interviews | Comments Off on Bill Cameron on Day One

The Noirest State: Akashic Books’ New Jersey Noir

I’m reading New Jersey Noir, the latest in the award-winning series of noir anthologies put out by Akashic Books. I’m a New Jersey native—from New Shrewsbury and later New Brunswick—so I’ve got a special interest in this one. Actually, I’m surprised that it has taken so long for Akashic to get to New Jersey, since it’s probably the noirest state in the country. After all, if you’re shaped like a little inverse California sitting in the shadows of both New York and Philadelphia, you’re a state with few illusions. And that’s what we find in New Jersey Noir, people whose bubbles are burst but still get by.

I started reading it geographically with the places I knew best – Asbury Park, the Jersey shore, Long Branch, and Atlantic City, then onto Cherry Hill, Newark, Camden, Hoboken, and Jersey City. I ended in the Kittatinny Mountains with the collection’s editor, Joyce Carol Oates.

New Jersey NoirNew Jersey Noir is a bit more academic than some of the other books in the noir series, but in a good way. It’s got a thoughtful but not too professorial introduction by Oates and even some noir poetry by Robert Pinsky, Paul Muldoon, C. K. Williams, and Alicia Ostriker. I hadn’t thought of poetry as noir, but why not: there is certainly noirish music and you can almost hear Bruce Springsteen singing along in the background of some of the stories.

Because it’s noir, the stories are often about the state’s losers and outcasts, people who’ve lost their way, haven’t yet found it, or never will. There’s plenty of betrayal as sketchy small-timers cut each other off at the knees. Robert Arellano’s “Kettle Run,” set in Cherry Hill, offers up two high school misfits who run afoul of some brainless dope dealers, and Jeffrey Ford’s “Glass Eels” treats us to a couple of broke guys trying to strike it rich by poaching elvers–the three-inch-long translucent eels that sell for $1000 a pound.

Some characters meet grisly ends as they deal drugs or try to get rich quick. Others grow up a little, like Stacy and Rina in Richard Burgin’s “Atlantis,” or the morgue tech Jinx in S. A. Solomon’s “Live for Today.” There’s even a sympathetic high-priced lawyer (named Cash) in Lou Manfredo’s story of cops in Camden. Some stories have a gothic feel to them, and Halloween and bodies are recurring themes. “Excavation” by Edmund White and Michael Carroll takes us to Asbury Park on Halloween as a couple of middle-aged professors search for a missing grad student who’s fallen off the wagon. And Oates’s own story “Run Kiss Daddy” is a macabre family excursion to the fictional Paraquarry Lake in the western part of the state where a father digs up a body on his old campsite. It’s not called the Garden State for nothing.

Sometimes, though, we catch characters who don’t just get by in the world but smartly come out on top against the odds and expectations. One of my favorites was S. J. Rozan’s “New Day Newark,” where 88-year-old Miss Crawford sets the street gangs against each other in a story that brings small town gossip to the inner-city. There’s some history here too. “The Enigma of Grover’s Mill” by Bradford Morrow takes place in the fictional town where H. G. Wells’s Martians landed in 1938 and “Meadowlands Spike” by Barry Malzberg and Bill Pronzini solves the 1975 Hoffa disappearance.

What’s missing? I would’ve liked a Turnpike story and maybe something about the Ramapo Mountain people. And a story by Wallace Stroby, I think. We already need a New Jersey Noir 2 (so there, Brooklyn Noir 2), but this is a great start.

Reading New Jersey Noir is watching people learn about themselves–I kept thinking of Bruce Springsteen’s song “Growin’ up,” which has the line I strolled all alone through a fallout zone and came out with my soul untouched. Maybe that’s the heart of noir. But as far as New Jersey’s concerned, I think John Gorka got it right too in his song “I’m from New Jersey,” where he described it as a state of people who know which exit, and where [they’re] bound. New Jersey is both of these.

Posted in Ideas and Opinions, What People Are Reading | Comments Off on The Noirest State: Akashic Books’ New Jersey Noir

Oh Mother! A guest post by Paul Michael Oliphant

You know the story of Hamlet—the King is killed by his brother Claudius, who usurps the throne and marries the Queen. Prince Hamlet discovers his uncle’s guilt through a visit from his father’s ghost, but he hesitates in exacting his revenge. Why? Does he question the ghoul’s sincerity? Besides needing meat between the pages, Shakespeare wanted to build a story of deception, torment, and, apparently, psychoanalysis.

The bigwig psychoanalyst, Sigmund Freud, wrote about Hamlet in his famous Interpretation of Dreams, claiming that all of the poor prince’s problems stemmed from one source—his mother, Gertrude. He writes that every male possesses an underlying sexual attraction to his mother, and, because of that, a jealousy of his father. Is this why Hamlet doesn’t slice Claudius up right away? Because he wants his mom? Perhaps. But probably not.

Freud also talked about the id, ego, and superego, three things we’ve heard from our ex-psychology-major friends. The ghost acts as Hamlet’s superego, the external force that tells him to kill. This influence leaks into his ego, or consciousness or conscience, but his unconscious mother-loving id tells him to ruminate. Perhaps this route of Freud’s is better than the first.

Another psychoanalyst to analyze Hamlet is Jacques Lacan, who applies the psychoanalytic phallus and mirror stage to the play. This term signifies the sexual difference between the dominant King and depressed Prince. When Hamlet’s father dies, he not only loses a parent, he loses his sense of manhood. He obsesses over his uncle’s incarnate phallus, develops a jaded view of his mother, and searches for sensuality in Ophelia, who symbolizes a substitute for what he lost. “Frailty, thy name is woman!,” the emotional Prince yelps. He holds metaphorical mirrors up to everyone, trying to see them react to their own ugliness, but he fails to examine himself, the true frail child. When Hamlet watches Gertrude and Claudius during the play within the play, He wants to see their guilt and then bask in it, introjecting his desire into his two victims. Hamlet not only expects to see their guilt, but he wants to see it emerge.

The last but certainly not least strain is that of Carl Jung, a Swiss psychoanalyst who developed the psychoanalytic idea of archetypes (and much more!). According to Jung, Hamlet has two goals: To gain a strong, efficient ego that can perform revenge; and to eradicate his ego by returning his mother to her embodiment of his childhood imagination. Once Hamlet realizes that his mother isn’t the perfect archetype of a mother that he thought she was, he is taken aback in hornswoggled inaction. His inability to distinguish these archetypes from reality results in his confusion that everyone mistakes as madness.

So what exactly makes Hamlet wait? Perhaps he doesn’t want to sleep with his mother, but instead he finally saw her as a woman rather than just a mother, a new view that scares him out of his wits. Gertrude’s hasty marriage disgusts her son, who shortly sets out on a quest for redemption through Lacanian guilt trips and pretended madness. Thanks to psychoanalysis, the motives and reasons behind Hamlet’s inaction become clear, or did this just confuse you?

[Paul Michael Oliphant is a 2011 graduate of Southern Oregon University who is going on to San Francisco State University to study linguistics. His senior capstone project dealt with Anglo-Saxon and Norse Influence in Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit.]

Posted in Ideas and Opinions | Comments Off on Oh Mother! A guest post by Paul Michael Oliphant